Due to the nature of the people we are set out to fight there are a few government infiltrators who are gaining access to our site to see what information we hold so they can try and stop what we are doing in order to help non resident parents fight the unlawful ,draconian, corrupt Agency now known as the Child Maintenance Enforcement Commissioner. However we have a system in place that allows us to filter out infiltrators to help protect those genuine people who come to us asking for help.

  We are gaining a great deal of knowledge to prevent this corrupt agency taking unlawful measures to take money unlawfully for what they class as MONEY GOING TO THE CHILDREN, when we know that it is not, it is all for increasing revenue for the Treasury which is being ploughed into an unlawful, charitable organisation known as Common Purpose. For those of you who are unaware of this organisation then please take a look at Brian Gerrish and Common Purpose on the web or youtube. Rest assured that all our members details will be kept confidential, we will continue to filter out the infiltrators so that we may carry on the fight against the Non Resident Parent Poverty.

  We are now the sister site of dwp corruption run by Martin Hossack which now makes the fight that little bit more effective and we can rest assure all peoples details will be kept fully confidential and will not be seen by any outside body.

 

  We have also been criticised slated and had vexatious remarks made towards us as a group and also individually even before the Association was founded. As stated before, both myself and Sherri first joined up to a forum to seek help and advice on the CSA to help with our own case unfortunately there was very little help out there, and a lot of people angry at how the system were violating human rights, driving people into poverty and creating animosity between both parents of the children who the CSA claim to be helping .

 99% of the complaints were from non resident parents the same as ourselves, so after weeks of research plus experience of taking the corrupt CSA to court ourselves we decided that we would set up a an Association to help the non resident parents as we felt these were being the targets of this unlawful malicious corrupt run for profit organisation called the CSA.

 

  It also appears that we seem to be irritating a forum that pertains to fight the corruption of the CSA. This forum in question is afairercsaforall.co.uk, this forum is supposedly run to help both the NRP and PWC, now in their forum you will see they slate the CSA when a NRP complains about the draconian way the CSA have imposed DEOs without following the correct procedure, however when a PWC goes on stating that her ex has not paid a penny towards her, they then change direction and inform the PWC to get onto the CSA so they will catch up with him and start taking all his money and that will serve him right hmmmmmm so they claim to serve both sides.

 

 It has been brought to our attention that they are concerned about our methods of fighting the CSA, what we would like to know is what has it got to do with them how we operate?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If people come to us for help and assistance and we give them that help and assistance and reach a better solution to help an individual, what does it matter how that is brought about as long as it is LAWFUL.

 

We are very flattered that this group are concerned about members coming to our Association requesting help from us when all other avenues have failed. Members who have tried complaining to the CSA, to their MPS, had injustice done through the courts when imaginary arrears have been brought against them and then granted through the Corporate Courts who are working in conjunction with the CSA/CMEC, are now coming to us to find an alternative methods of sorting child maintenance out This group state this method cost hundreds sometimes thousands of pounds, although their is no mention of this group trying this method themselves, what we would like to know is how do they know this when they have not tried this themselves.

 It is very odd how these two individuals who one of them wanted to be Area Rep for our Association, will not show their faces, they do not show themselves on their videos, they get others to do their videos and advertise afairercsaforall for them. We have even offered on two occasions to meet up with these two individuals and we would go to them, but they both declined using the excuse that their members would not benefit from it.... How poor is that excuse? Now you know the truth and the truth will always out

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is an extract from their web site,  They state they are concerned about our group where, instead of promoting the assistance necessary to enable parents to correct errors, our group are urging parents to issue Statutory Declarations, Affidavits and notices to the CSA/CMEC.

 

What this group fail to realise is that the non resident parents come to us as the last resort as they have exhausted all other avenues, including Tribunals, Appeals MPs and any other prospects of sorting out the errors.

 This group seem to know all about the system we are trying, so we can only assume they know the costs will run into £100s if not £1000s, all we can say is when we have tried it and it has cost less than £10, perhaps they are trying expensive solicitors, who knows?.

 

They then go on to say we are going to go to HMCS to enforce the Statutory Declarations, we have not informed anybody about how we  enforce any documentation we use so we have no idea where they are coming from there. Talk about assumptions

When we state that the Child Support Act is not a law we can state it is fact, it is not LAW, it is merely Statutory Legislation which can only be enforced as a law with YOUR consent. However our Government do not want us knowing that because if we did, the Government along with all their other companies such as the CSA, would be bankrupt as they would not be able to claw in any revenue, so that is why when they refer to their LAWFUL DICTIONARY  known as the Collins Dictionary, they will be hard pressed to find that it will state Legislation ( a legislative rule of society given the force of a law by consent of the Governed) because if it did then the Government would have every Collins dictionary recalled.

 Our methods we promote are NOT fully tried and tested, really?, well we think they are perhaps looking at a different web site as our methods have been tried and tested and they work, unfortunately this group has been trying to find out what our methods are  since we began without any success. They state it is an uncertain experiment, who said we were experimenting, and it could result in a heavy financial burden, how do they know if they have no idea what we are doing. Then they state some of the information we are giving out is incorrect, again they do not know what info we are giving out, they have no idea what system we are using.

Our members are proof that our methods work and we are not forcing anybody to try anything they are not willing to  do. We have no legal expertise because legal is contractual, we are not interested in legalese as this is the biggest con the Government, along with its Police Force, CSA, Ministry of Justice, are trying to enforce upon us, we are ,however lawfully experienced, perhaps this group are not aware of the fact legal and lawful are NOT the same.

 They refer to my suspension at work, yet again they have only heard half a story perhaps it was one of their infiltrators not informing them of the full facts.